 Behold, here is a map of the world as I reckon it should look! Totally perfect! I think it looks great. I am not alone in thinking this way either. This map was actually created by one Stuart McArthur of Melbourne, Australia. When he actually drew his first "right side up" map at the age of twelve years old his geography teacher told him to redraw his assignment the "correct" way up if he wanted to pass the subject. Years later while attending Melbourne University, he produced the world's first modern "south up" map, and launched it on Australia Day in 1979.
Here's the thing. There is no particular reason why the Northern hemisphere should be perceived as being "up" or "on top" of the planet nor is this perspective necessarily "correct". Equally there is no reason why the South should be seen as "below" or "downunder" as it is often described as being. This is a convention that has taken place over a few centuries now, when northern hemisphere navigators started using the North Star and Magnetic compass. Before that, the top of the map was to the East which is where the word orientation comes from. The perception therefore of North as "above" is a eurocentric idea, and because most of us in the modern world grow up in cultures where this view is familiar, we "believe" unquestioningly that it is the only view. But in Biblical Times evidence from the Torah that east was at the top of all maps. In Genesis when Abraham's nephew, Lot, is captured in war and carried away and Abraham races to the rescue, when he and his men catch up with Lot's captors and set him free, this happens in "Chovah which is to the left of Damascus." (Gen. 14:15). Chovah is north of Damascus. In Psalms 89:13 it says, "The north and the right, You created them". This implies that right is synonymous with south, so you are facing east when you read the map. People in ancient Arabia placed south at the top. This is because when you wake up (in Arabia) and face the sun, south is on the right. Because of positive associations with the right as opposed to left, they put that on top. Yemen is so named because it is on the "yamin" right of Arabia. And of course, with the sea to the south of them there was nothing "on top" of the country, so they preferred it that way. The ancient Chinese were the first to invent the compass, which they always thought of as pointing south. To them, South was a sacred direction, and in ceremonies, the king would always face south. In Medieval Europe cartographers (people who draw maps) always drew Jerusalem on top of their maps because that was the Holy Land. This meant that east was more or less at the top. And in Aotearoa/New Zealand, the area where New Zealand's capital city Wellington now stands was known to our first nations people as Te Upoku O Te Ika (the Head of the Fish). This fish - as we know from the Maui legend - is the North Island. When we look at the now "normalised" modern map of our world it shows the head of the fish facing "down" towards Antarctica; the tail of the fish is on the northern end of the fish body. The problem here is that in the Maori view of the sacred and profane (tapu and noa), the head is never below the tail. One does not, for example, place your bum on a pillow where your head may later lie. In Maori cosmology, therefore, the head of the fish has to be on the "above" and southern end of the North Island. South is pointing upwards and now the Antarctic is on the "top of the world", as shown in the McArthur map.
 | Great! Now I don't know whether to laugh or cry, make a joke or take it absolutely seriously. I say we just do away with north, south, east, and west. Let the navigators so what they must. Is it possible to have it both ways? I burst out laughing when I saw the map, but I see what you're saying. We are very "ego"centric in where we are from. And it what is where and where it should be to orient us to our world. I wonder, is it to do with the "north pole" and the "south pole"? That there had to be a way to reconcile things so that we could distinguish direction for the modern world.......that which began after modern maps began being made. I ask this because I've seen a map of the eastern US that is exactly backward from what it really is, because it was drawn by someone from the UK a couple of centuries ago.
Want to hear something funny? Between you and another friend, in one fell swoop, I am now being watched by someone in a paralell univers as I scratch my head, and now you've given me reason to scratch my head!!! If you don't mind, I would like to share this. But not without your permission. |
 | Hopes Iri isn't watching while I nick off with her blog. Brilliant! I've been having altercations with one or two lately about being 'down under' and 'upside down land'. I'm gonna borrow this and stuff it in their gullet, lol. Interesting where all the different religions and cartographers put each country or area that was special to them. Wonders off singing 'I'm sitting on top of the World'
|
 | oops....now I'm for it! Becky asked first |
 | Well, if rizzo can borrow it, I can, too! No, I'll wait. |
 | NIce blog... popping on to Wikipedi got even more info, such as an in-depth article on the Mediaeval T-and-O maps you describe. |
 | now you're playing on my conscience....I'll have to wait too...lmao |
 | Borrow and welcome, spread the good word even, and remember when you save the map that you can get a bigger pic to save from by clicking on it.
*joining Rizzy in singing "I'm on the top of the world"* |
 | Well, I was going to say thank you for being revolting, but since you're being so generous, I'll refrain! :p |
 | got a bloody headacke now .i don't know which way to fly south for the winter |
 | just follow your nose....errr....beak!
I'm gonna follow mine down the hallway right now....tis bedtime up here on the top of the world. Night Johnboy., Night MaryEllen |
 | Sheeeeeeeeeeeesh... speak for yourself.... I'm not revolting... I'm just wunnerful...
oh yeah .... um, the map..... of course it's right the way you have it here...... anyone can see that. I mean ... gravity... see.... all those big heavy bits have dropped to the bottom...... |
 | I'm beginning to feel that I'm the only American on this page at the moment, and I've always been upside down. (mentally. at least) Nope, gonna leave it alone and walk away, while I still can. Good night Jimbob. |
 | I rather like this map Iri. |
 | Very informative blog. You're not a wide reader, are you? :) |
 | it happened coz the northern hemisphere is overpopulated and top heavy.... one day, the world just couldnt take it no more, and fell over,,,,, no we're on top of the world.......... Is this what is meant by "the meek shall in herit the top of the world""?....... |
Comment deleted at the request of the author.
 | BUT BUT BUT..... if we turn the planet upside down all the water will run to the bottom of the planet and Canada and Scandinavian countries will drown. Why is everything made in China? One end of the needle already DOES point South to the bottom. We could just re-label the compass so North would point down to the bottom ?? . . RESEARCH - HERE's THE ANSWER, it doesn't matter anyway because soon the poles will reverse. http://bertthemensachicken.multiply.com/journal/item/85and even though South is at the Top, New Zealand will STILL be at the bottom. ??? . . NOW if we twisted the Earth 90 degrees, then Winter and Summer would occur on the same day, everyday of the year, or the bottom would be permanent Winter or visa versa. Then NZ would be ether East or West depending on what time of day it was, or which way you tip the Earth. |
 | haha, you're on top of the world... |
 | hey iri, this is really gonna mess up Americans who are still grappling with the fact that the earth is not flat :) |
 | and have you ever noticed how many million lakes there are in Canada? More upsidedown waterlogging ...lol |
 | Lmao!! Well done Rizzy, I can see you are really thinking this one through. |
 | Well, if you (me) stand upside down, that would put NZ on top ??? |
 | You could try that Bert... |
 | This has to be the BEST blog of the year! Wonderful. Sending my sister to your site so that she can recognise which way is up when she goes overseas in a couple of weeks - *grin* |
 | I distinctly remember commenting on this blog! Because i said that Geography had not been my best subject! I put liverpool on wrong side of the Mersey in an exam. But at least i never went THIS far! What did you do with England, or is it just my glasses? Not to mention my comment either yesterday or day before? |
 | Ifik. Isn't the world flat? |
 | I just got a mail last week from a friend about how the plates shift in earthquakes etc. It had a map of what the world will eventually look like. I seem to recall England didn't want to join anything on there either. I'll hunt it out. If we connect it to this theory as well, the maps will be up the other way and most of the continents joined! I'm sure New Zealand of course....was still a stand alone nation. Special to the nth degree! |
 | Rizzo...the plates of the earth move, and we have earth quakes because, the earth expands,,,,hence the movements..... England willl always be a break-away from Europe, just as New Zealand is from Australia................tis the shifting of the plates that cause it ......... |
 | I realise that......this is a humorous look at the future world after the plates have shifted quite a lot. I'll post it on my page...it's too big to put in here
|
 | there are many projections, each has its uses. it has always bothered me to see ones where North America (the US, of course) is in the middle and Eurasia is slip to accomodate our particular worldview. My favorite is a Pacif-centered projection that has the landmasses cluttering up the edges of all the water. |
 | Here's the thing. There is no particular reason why the Northern hemisphere should be perceived as being "up" or "on top" of the planet nor is this perspective necessarily "correct". Equally there is no reason why the South should be seen as "below" or "downunder" as it is often described as being. This is a convention that has taken place over a few centuries now, when northern hemisphere navigators started using the North Star and Magnetic compass.
Before that, the top of the map was to the East which is where the word orientation comes from. The perception therefore of North as "above" is a eurocentric idea, and because most of us in the modern world grow up in cultures where this view is familiar, we "believe" unquestioningly that it is the only view.  I'm guilty as charged. Heck, I was taught that way. In fact, I've found it kind of charming to think of myself as living "down under" since I moved to Perth. But right, perception depends on where you are. From the perspective of outer space, there is no up or down or sideways. I mean, do we live in the upper part of the Milky Way or the lower part.... However, there is spin. The Earth spins on an axis which is tilted. And there is an equator and people live either above or below the equator. But I'm inclined to agree that "below" has a negative "spin" so to speak, at least in most peoples' minds. Somebody mentions "projection" too, in terms of the maps made of the Earth. My understanding is that "Mercator" projection makes Africa look much smaller than it actually is in relation to Europe and the Americas: "The Mercator projection creates increasing distortions of size as you move away from the equator. As you get closer to the poles the distortion becomes severe. Cartographers refer to the inability to compare size on a Mercator projection as "the Greenland Problem." Greenland appears to be the same size as Africa, yet Africa's land mass is actually fourteen times larger (see figure below right). Because the Mercator distorts size so much at the poles it is common to crop Antarctica off the map. This practice results in the Northern Hemisphere appearing much larger than it really is. Typically, the cropping technique results in a map showing the equator about 60% of the way down the map, diminishing the size and importance of the developing countries. This was convenient, psychologically and practically, through the eras of colonial domination when most of the world powers were European. It suited them to maintain an image of the world with Europe at the center and looking much larger than it really was. Was this conscious or deliberate? Probably not, as most map users probably never realized the Eurocentric bias inherent in their world view. When there are so many other projections to chose from, why is it that today the Mercator projection is still such a widely recognized image used to represent the globe? The answer may be simply convention or habit. The inertia of habit is a powerful force." http://www.diversophy.com/petersmap.htm |
 | Another excellent entry....
It always amazes me how folks are kerflummoxed when I say I am going up to Christchurch or I am going down to Northland (as you know, for now I live in Te Upoko o Te Ika... The head of the fish - Wellington).
On another note: I fly out of Wellington and head up your way this afternoon....
I have your phone number, will give you a call within the next few days. till then sister.
|
 | That's very interesting. I haven't even noticed that there different positions of maps :) |
 | Now you are UP with us other downunder folk Danny! |
 | Very interesting article. blessed be mon ami |
 | I am pleased that people are enjoying it, thank you for visiting. |
 | ifiik wrote on Mar 11, edited on Mar 11 I just tripped over in Melbourne.......................and got back on me feet in Darwin.......rotflmao......... bloody weird this upside down world.......... |
| |